The Position of Defendant, Joyce Elbery - Ewers has his client, Joyce Elbery, blame Michael Elbery for the Picariello Sale failure because Michael Elbery refused to sign the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement; Joyce who is a renowned liar, according to Kathleen Elbery, fails to include that only 2 of the 5 owners of the house at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. signed the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement. Joyce via her "Position of Plaintiff, Joyce Elbery" on Ewer's "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" spends most of her time defending Attorney James A. McLaughlin and Attorney Charles Long's fraud that caused the Picariello Sale to be aborted. Joyce, like a the liar that she has always been, failed to mention that when she signed the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement she committed a Breach of Contract because there was no insurance on the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. and therefore she failed to comply with paragraph #13 of that Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement. Joyce Elbery knew she was committing a Breach of Contract because Michael Elbery told all the owners of the house at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. that Attorney James A. McLaughlin stole the home insurance money and there was no insurance on the house. Joyce also points to Exhibits A through M, attached to Ewer's "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" , to support her cause; sadly for Joyce and her free Attorney they are irrelevant regarding any liability to Michael Elbery for the Cost of the "Petition for Partition" of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass..
Neither Joyce Elbery or her free Attorney, Raymond "the Clam" Ewer, mention that the "Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement" violated Michael Elbery's U.S. Constitutional Right to Represent himself without an Attorney of the Mass. Bar. Instead, Joyce does recognize that the "Notice Clause" on the "Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement" required that Attorney Charles Long act as Michael Elbery's attorney, as well as, complaining that Michael Elbery demanded that his 1/5 share of the house sale proceeds be delivered to him at the closing, instead of to an Attorney who does not represent him, all which Joyce Elbery called frivolous. Only a greedy attorney would have their client call Constitutional Rights to Self-Representation frivolous.
Joyce Elbery's accusations, half-truths and especially her Opinions are legally worthless to cause Michael Elbery to be liable for the Cost of the Petition for Partition.
The Position of Defendant, Robert Elbery - Robert Elbery Does some simpleton Lying -
Although Attorney Raymond "the clam" Ewer is not Robert Elbery's attorney, Ewer does an amateur job of putting words in Robert's mouth, words that Robert Elbery never heard of before. The "Position of Robert Elbery" section of Ewers' "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" first makes false claim, by Ewers not Robert Elbery, that there were 4 attempts to sell the Estate House and all 4 were sabotaged by "Michael Elbery with his malicious and with his frivolous accusations of all who enter his path of destruction in attempt to deface those whom are above him in society, whether by subject for his personal amusement or the effect of wild paranoia in Michael Elbery's mind, the reason is unknown." Is all this anger describing the 4 attempts of the Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.? Isn't it coincidental that the word "frivolous" appears in both Robert's and Joyce's "position"; the reason is easy and that is that Ewers authored all not Joyce or Robert.
Ewers speaking for Robert presents no evidence that Michael Elbery sabotaged any Sale of the Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. Most of the issues raised by Ewers for Robert Elbery are irrelevant to the sale of the Estate House and who caused those sales to fail. Instead Ewers confuses himself with "paths of destruction" and " defacing those whom are above him in society"??? Ewers wants to make it a Social issue, then, he should read Social Evolution U.S.A. and the hyperlink on this web site on the truth of 9-11-01.
However, Ewer does admit he doesn't know reason ("reason unknown") and that he can't read Michael Elbery's mind, but what is really bothering this Jewish Boy from Newton, Mass. about Michael Elbery?
Robert Elbery never wrote the above quoted material in the above paragraph, especially the "those whom are above him in society"! Robert Elbery cuts lawns for a living, even a dope like Ewer should know that Robert was a poor candidate to hide behind while falsely putting words in this poor youngsters mouth because Robert could not say that. How does this "Clam" of an attorney measure society rank? Michael Elbery is a C.P.A. and a Licensed Construction Supervisor with and M.B.A. from Babson '77 and has a Bachelor of Science Degree from Northeastern University in Boston, Mass.. Not only that he publishes this web site www.massinjustice which is read by over 200 people a day from all over the World. Evidently, Attorney Robert Ewers is another one of them that thinks he is Royalty. Oh, they so dearly want to be Royalty, but they are interbreeding tribes causing genetic inferiors, who have Wandered the Earth for Centuries after being ostracized by the Son of God and the Roman Emporers from their claimed Promise Land, all fulfilling the prophecy. A real estate attorney is the lowest man on the totem pole in the World of Legaldom; his standard is not "effective assistance of counsel" but "good title". There have been for decades, now, in this here U.S.A. multitudes of law school graduates who never find a job and the ones that do rely on Court Appointments to make a living. Speaking of Society, most attorneys of the Bar are nothing but Social Parasites and the Courts are busy sweeping all the Scandal that is built in to their Court House under the Judicial Carpet, so that the People of the United States can't get too much evidence. But Ewers, you can't fool all the People.
What is bothering Ewers about Michael Elbery are his victories in the Courts of Massachusetts and Federal Court under the most adverse and illegal conditions, just read this web Site. The victory that really hurts Ewer's feelings and hits him at home is Michael Elbery's domination and disposal of Chief Justice of the Federal District of Massachusetts, Judge Mark Wolf. Wolf was shamed by Michael Elbery's Internet Publication of Wolf's Scandal and documented illegalities in the Federal Court in Boston, Mass. during the section 1983 case, Michael Elbery v. Sklut et al. (the Shrewsbury Police Dept.) causing Federal Judge Mark Wolf to resign. Also, Attorney Moe Bergman was publicly degraded, humiliated and mocked after he got caught lying under oath during a Kangaroo Trial out in Worcester, Mass.; the trial judge, Dan Toomey, died because of that trial and all its deliberate and planned mockery of Justice, but Ewers isn't worried about that Irishman.
Ewers, you may think you are some new breed of Royalty in the once Great United States that was founded and built by far better people than yours, but your rank in Society as "Real Estate Attorney" is the definition of mediocrity for those who know better. Who will Protect the People? Read this Web Site, you'll learn who is responsible for the Events of 9-11-01 and who Assassinated Kennedy (the beginning of the Insurgency). Ewers, you can also learn how Goldman Sachs made $60 Billion off the planned Financial Panic of 2008.
No wonder, Ewers proclaimed during his sole phone conversation with Michal Elbery on 11-14-17 that the Internet can't be trusted? Ewers is afraid of the truth that is censored by U.S. Main Stream Media that is controlled by the few, whose Agenda is to destroy the United States and make it post-mark on their New World Order. How about a new crime in the United States that makes it treason for any Group to Organize against the rest of Society for their own Aggrandizement and Power? What should the penalty be for such crime against the Americans? Would Execution be appropriate? That is the penalty for Treason.
Did Ewer's say Paranoia? "The Clam" got Mad because Michael Elbery documents everything, so the over 200 readers a day of this web sit www.massinjustice.org will understand the truth. No one expects truth from Ewer, he does not understand the concept, nor can he or his ilk understand the Concepts of Liberty, Justice and Freedom brought to the World by the Anglo-Saxons, who are all Tuetons.
The reason Michael Elbery writes his web site www.massinjustice.org should be simple for even a biased Ewer to understand. It is Justice!
What is bothering Ewer and his ilk is that they are not White. Regardless of any other factors, they know their Social Strata is inferior.
The New World Order. A Society run by a few organized against the genetically superior majority who produced the wealth and Greatness that was the United States. This guy Ewer still has to work (such vile work - pushing papers and hustling law so to make money), evidently he does not include himself in his imagined high ranking strata of Society. Tell them that the end is coming, even though they try to re-write history and Control the minds of the masses with their control of the medias. Ewer, Pay your mortgage and car payments and don't forget your rent at the "Chatham Center" and the help, and maybe you'll have some time and money left over to relish your false Social standing and afford a bagel.
Robert Elbery, now, claims all Sales of the Elbery Estate House were sabotaged by Michael Elbery. Robert Elbery wasn't saying this in the Spring of 2017 when he decided to work with Michael Elbery and defect from David Elbery and his attorney, Billy Crowe, because he claimed "they were keeping him in the dark" for two years concerning the Estate of June Elbery. Attorney Billy Crowe needed Robert Elbery on David Elbery's side so to insure that David Elbery didn't find himself the only heir advocating Crowe's strategies aimed at gaining Crowe more Legal Fees off the Death and Estate of June Elbery by keeping the Estate of June Elbery open indefinitely. David Elbery makes friends no matter how much it costs him, otherwise, Attorney Billy Crowe and brother, Attorney Michael Crowe, would not even talk to David Elbery.
Attorney Billy Crowe could only maximize his legal fees off his client - David Elbery and the Esate of June Elbery by keeping that Estate open as long as possible and that includes making sure the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. did not get sold. Crowe was in contact with Attorney James A. McLaughlin conspiring to manipulate the Estate activities until their objective could fulfilled which is more fees for both Attorney Crooks.
Robert Elbery, per Ewers' "Joint Case Management Conference Statement", claims that Michael Elbery is personally responsible for sabotaging 4 sales attempts of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. Robert, then lists 4 attempted house sales and falsifies the reason for blaming Michael Elbery for defeating each sales attempt so that he, Robert, does not have to pay for any of the cost of the Petition for Partition and make Michael Elbery liable for the entire cost which will be over $100,000.00.
1. The Hanna Deals (February through March of 2016) -
First, Robert Elbery falsifies the alleged sales attempt by Steve Hanna of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. Robert Elbery was barely contacted by Steve Hanna (First Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery), Hanna always contacted Michael Elbery regarding matters of both the Probated Estate and then the Estate House. Hanna had dozens of conversations with Michael Elbery and they exchanged over 50 emails in the months that Hanna liquidated the Probate Estate of June Elbery (the personal property, including bank accounts and cash, left by June Elbery) and then Hanna contracted with 5 owners of the June Elbery's Estate House to sell that house. What Robert leaves out is that Hanna threatened Michael Elbery and some of the other heirs that they would be liable for the cost of a "Petition for Partition", if they didn't agree to contract with him at his hourly rate of $225.00hour to sell their Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.
It is a serious mistake when the contracted sales person works for an hourly wage rather than commission. Robert (actually Ewer) claims that Hanna made "marketing efforts" to sell the Estate House, including "Direct Mail to local builders", Craig's list, and Newspaper Listing (probably means adds). However, that is all inaccurate and the highlight of Hanna's "marketing efforts" to sell the Elbery Estate House was a $1,200.00 add in the Boston Sunday Globe with no contact telephone number so a potential buyer could learn the location of the house and get information; no, Hanna, being a state worker did only what was good for his lazy self (more of Ewer high society). Steve Hanna only put an email address in that $1,200.00 a day add in the Globe and as you would expect Hanna got no responses. Only a fucking jerk off would do something like that; Hanna was throwing our money away while billing us in his incompetence and fraud at $225.00 (more wasted money). Ewer's claim that Hanna used "Direct Mail to local Builders" is new and inventive on the part of Ewers; when Michael Elbery had a sales contract with Needham Building Cliff London in August of 2106, Hanna expressed shock during phone conversation with Michael Elbery in August as to how he could have sold the house in one day! Michael Elbery said that he found many web sites with the names and contact information of Home Builders in Needham, Mass. and surrounding area. Hanna was humbled and sounded worried. These Scribes and Pharisees refuse to pay the proper respect, they only understand it when it really hurts.
Another highlight of Steve Hanna's extraordinary Gross Negligence while being under hourly wage contract to sell the Elbery Estate House is that he advertised it at $65,000,000.00; that $65MILLION DOLLAR price tag resulted in avoidance by the rest of the World and Steve Hanna blamed the Elbery heirs and their Estate House by claiming "there is no interest in the house." Hanna only actively made negligent effort to sell the Estate House for two weeks (last two weeks in March of 2016) before Hanna quit and went on his second vacation to Florida within those first 3 months as the Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery. Hanna's Appointment as Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery officially ended on May 31, 2016.
Hanna also advertised in the Globe and local newspapers that he was having an "Open House" at the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass., however, true to form, Hanna only provided his worthless email address for contact by the World of Prospective Buyers, who have been otherwise dying to buy any and all real estate in Needham, Mass. for decades. Like Attorney, Billy Crowe, said to Michael Elbery on 11-14-17, "selling a house in Needham is as Easy as 1,2,3," and for once Crowe was right. Crowe has a real "chip on his little shoulder" because he has lost all three of his litigations surrounding the Estate of June Elbery to Michael Elbery. And now Crowe loses again because he will not be provided the easy money he sought via a "Petition for Partition" on the Elbery Estate House.
Hanna's Open House was scheduled on a Monday morning (Nice fucking time to have an Open House - everyone is working), but the lazy idiot saw some snow flakes down at his water view house in Westport, Mass. (next to Fall River) and cancelled the Open House without anybody knowing. Hanna then had the Open house the next day, on a Tuesday morning. Hanna called Joyce Elbery, who is absolutely stupid and greedy, and convinced poor helpless Joyce Elbery that there is no interest in the Elbery Estate House because no one showed for Hanna's Tuesday morning Open House. Joyce had already counted her money and had decided to live off June Elbery's inheritance, as well as, other inheritances she pre-maturely planned on (thinks Kathleen will die soon and leave her a little something) and social Benefits she qualifies from. Joyce went into a melt-down of Emotional Distress because she believed Steve Hanna, for some irrational reason unknown, that there were no buyers for our Estate House.
Hanna told Michael Elbery that he, Hanna, had never done this before (sold an Estate House), after all Hanna had no Authority over any Estate House, his job was just liquidation of the Personal Property which is called the Probate Estate. Steve Hanna never involved the Probate Court regarding his private (side job) contract with the 5 heirs of June Elbery to sell the house they inherited at 168 Fairfield st., Needham, Mass.
The only thing relevant that Ewer's discloses in Robert's "Position of the Defendant, Robert Elbery" and is also substantially true is that Hanna made 2 verbal offers of $600,000.00 for the Estate House to Robert. Substantially true, because Steve Hanna only made one offer, also verbal, to Michael Elbery by phone for $600,000.00, while also revealing that the offer was refused by David Elbery. To Michael Elbery's best Knowledge Robert is correct that none of the owners of the Estate House accepted the Hanna $600,000.00 from some potential buyer because $600,000.00 was far short of the minimum sales price set for the Estate House by the 5 owners. Robert is also correct, because Ewers read this hyperlink on the Probate of June Elbery's Estate, see below, that Hanna made an Offer to Michael Elbery for the Estate House for $425,000.00. Hanna never went near the other owners with that first $425K offer; Hanna used Michael Elbery to test that sucker price of $425K that allegedly, per Hanna, came from a "Realtor Friend in the Needham area". It would be over another year before Robert Elbery decided to "flip sides" and defect from David Elbery's side to Michael Elbery's side, so how would Robert be privy to any evidence as to what Hanna's dealings were with Michael Elbery. It is simply a case of Ewers reading the information Michael Elbery reported on Hanna's fraudulent activity, as below this article reported on the Estate of June Elbery.
Then, Ewers deliberately gets his facts and conclusions wrong. Although he admits that Robert and all heirs refused Hanna's $600K verbal Offer for the Estate House, Ewer claims by speaking for Robert that "Michael Elbery sabotaged our first attempt of a sale and caused the resignation of Steve Hanna as Personal Representative." This is contrary to what Robet claims! Robert claimed, per "Positition of the Defendant, Robert Elbery, that Hanna's Verbal Offers were refused. Hanna didn't resign as Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery until April 30, 2016 which was after he decided to cut his Sales Contract for the Estate House short in March of 2016. Ewers claims that Michael Elbery caused Hanna to resign as Personal Representative because of the report Michel Elbery broadcast to Internet on his web site www.massinjustice.org (see it below) about Hanna's fraud and planned stealing due to the fact that he made no attempt to sell the Estate House but tried to convince the heirs that the house was not saleable, so Hanna could get the house at a "low ball price". Ewer does not seem to understand that Hanna's Court Appointment as Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery and Hanna's Contract to Sell the Estate House with the 5 heirs and owners of the Estate House are legally distinct and separate. Michael Elbery did not write, let alone publish the story on Steve Hanna's injustice surrounding his illegalities of the Estate of June Elbery until months after Hanna officially quit as Personal Representative on May 31, 2017 and even longer after Hanna got tied of his contract to sell the Estate House in March of 2017.
The reason Hanna resigned as Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery is because there was no Personal Property of the Probated Estate of June Elbery to liquidate, see his Finalized account activity the final entries were on February 15 of 2016 which were the distributions to the 5 heirs. Hanna left $60K in the Probated Estate for Attorney James A. McLaughlin to Steal, just a planned because without stealing other peoples inheritance Attorney James A. McLaughlin can't make a living. McLaughlin is a thief.
Hanna walked away from the Contract to sell the Elbery Estate House simply because he made enough money, $7K, to fund his Florida vacation. That's right, Hanna was working to sell the Estate House at $225.00/hr. and made $7,000.00 that he took from the Probated Estate funds he controlled and then split on anther Florida vacation.
So how did Michael Elbery sabotage the Sale of the Estate House with Steve Hanna? Ewers and Robert Elbery don't provide any evidence! They just say-so and make generalized false accusations unsupported by by evidence that it was Michael Elbery's fault that Steve Hanna quit otherwise the house would have somehow been sold by Hanna.
2. Attorney Greg Condon's hearsay verbal Offer unsupported by Consideration and the expired written Hughe's Offer
On page 3 of Ewer's Ewers second edition of his "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" , Robert Elbery claims that Michael Elbery caused Attorney Greg Condon's $650K hearsay verbal Offer for the Estate House to be aborted. Ewers claims that Michael Elbery caused that Condon Sale to go down the drain because Michael Elbery made frivolous issue out of the fact that Condon's Offer was Verbal. What Ewers does not admit is that a verbal offer in real estate is meaningless, it has to be in writing to be legally binding. What kind of lawyer would write something like this? Ewer's calls it frivolous to demand simple compliance with the law! Ewer is in the same class of aardvark attorneys as Attorney Billy Crowe; Attorney Billy Crowe, representing David Elbery, actually accepted Condon's hearsay verbal Offer!
Attorney Greg Condon was introduced to the owners of the Elbery Estate House by Attorney James A. McLaughlin via McLaughlin's introductory letter of June 22, 2016. Condon hustles real estate sales in Needham, Mass. to supplement his paltry legal business that is comprised of doing personal income tax returns (another pee-on attorney who is starving to death). Condon offered to sell the Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. for the Elbery's for a 1% sales commission which even a dummy like Ewer should know is cause for concern; obviously this smug-ass goony bird attorney, Greg Condon, wasn't going to work for the Elbery's best interest for a lousy 1% commission.
What Ewers left out is that David Elbery, at the advise of his overpaid attorney, Billy Crowe, refused to hire Condon. Condon was all upset and contacted Michael Elbery, who had to advise this poor excuse for knowledge of law, that he didn't need David's permission and could continue looking for a buyer for the Estate House and submit the offer to the 5 owners of the house. Gooney - Bird Greg Condon presented all the heirs with a verbal hearsay offer (this Ewer's leaves out) which all accepted but Michael Elbery. Condon also demanded from the sucker Elberys that they take their house off the market for 5 months until the winter started in November (so that Condon's buyer Hughes could Jew them down because they had no legal binding and required written offer). Condon failed at conning Michael Elbery, although he was successful in coning the other 4 owners of the Estate House into verbally agreeing to his Condon's verbal hearsay Offer; ironically, Attorney Kathleen Elbery and David Elbery's attorney, Billy "I went to Law School" Crowe agreed to Condon's legally meaningless verbal heasay Offer for the Estate House in the amount of $650K. Then, because Michael Elbery refused Attorney Greg Condon's verbal hearsay Real Estate Offer, Attorney James A. McLaughlin got into the act and tried to do his own con-job, but when Michael Elbery told McLaughlin law 101 (it has to be in writing and there has to be a deposit) that old fart, Attorney James A. McLaughlin, exclaimed in high pitched old man's voice, "your right"!
Ewers can't tell the truth and Robert Elbery does not know the truth as to what happened next because he didn't even talk to Michael Elbery during 2016, but what Ewers lies about is that McLaughlin then sent Michael Elbery a written Hughes' Offer for the Estate House; however what Ewers does not want anybody to know is the lawyers' (Condon and McLaughlin) next feeble and stupid trick was to send Michael Elbery a written Hughes' Offer that was already expired. So no deal. Ewers conveniently left out the written Hughes Offer was EXPIRED. And Robert Elbery knew nothing about it because they never sent him anything, he was "left in the dark" and told what to do and say by Attorney Crowe through David Elbery.
Here's the law - if there was no written offer then there was no legally binding Offer or there was no offer and you can't lie and say Michael Elbery is liable for a "Petition for Partition" now filed by Joyce Elbery because he exercised his rights to not verbally agree to a Condon's verbal hearsay offer just because the other 4 dum-dum Elbery's got tricked by Attorney Condon. Further, an Expired written Real Estate sales contract from Attorney James a. McLaughlin is as legally worthless. So Ewers can go chase his tail and bark up a tree and shit his pants, again, because Ewers has nothing on Michael Elbery in his Agenda to rip off Michael Elbery and getting the Land Court to find that he is liable for the cost of Joyce Elbery's "Petition for Partition".
Want all the evidence on the Condon Hearsay Offer fiasco then scroll down to the Gooney Bird Greg Condon section, below.
Ewers also decides Morality and claims that "Michael Elbery again crossed the moral line" and contacted the buyer, Hughes, which according to Ewers "left the buyer to know what Michael Elbery was all about". Here is Ewers setting the "Moral Standard", but what Ewers can't understand is that it is Michael Elbery's right to contact Hughes, the alleged Condon Customer, that Condon made the verbal hearsay offer for. Further, Michael Elbery was fully within his right to speak to Hughes to investigate the fraudulent Attorney Greg Condon. Further, the Hughes deal was past tense and voided and Attorney Greg Condon quit trying to con-job Michael Elbery before Michael Elbery called Hughes and told him if he wanted the Estate House he would have to write - up a new Offer that was not Expired and present it to all the 5 owners for their approval and signing. Hughes got mad and screamed that the way he does business is never in writing (in other words Hughes does everything illegally). Michael Elbery told Hughes that if Hughes does not want to comply with the law and make his Offer in writing on the Elbery Estate House then Hughes would not be the purchaser of the Estate House.
No Court or Judge in this here United States would find Michael Elbery liable for the cost of a "Petition for Partition" because he refused Attorney Greg Condon's con-job in the form of a verbal hearsay Offer for Real Estate in Massachusetts. Nor would any Judge or Court find Michael Elbery liable for the cost of a "Petition for Partition" because Michael Elbery refused to sign a written Offer sent to him by Attorney James A. McLaughlin that has already expired and therefore was legally meaningless. But Attorney Raymond "the clam" Ewers does, but what can you expect from another fraud job attorney, who now claims that Michael Elbery reasons for refusing the Hughe's Offer, which were a verbal hearsay real estate Offer and an Expired Offer, are frivolous reasons?
3. The Picariello Sale & Realtor Ned Mahoney
The third sales attempt of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. that Robert Elbery claims Michael Elbery sabotaged is the Picariello Sales Attempt of late April through about May 3, 2017 when exclusive listing realtor, Ned Mahoney, was ordered by the controlling Attorneys (buyer's attorney and 4 of the seller's attorney) to kill the sale when 4 of the 5 owners of the Estate House refused to sign Attorney James A. McLaughlin's Assent to Sell Real Estate which would have legally entitled Attorney McLauglin to the $750K check sales proceeds.
This third attempt is referred to only by a date, April 17, 2017, not so strange for the deliberate inaccuracies of Attorney of Raymond "the clam" Ewer, he leaves out the buyer's name, Picariello, but instead makes the issue the crooked realtor, Ned Mahoney.
Once again the main theme for Attorney Raymond "the clam" Ewer regarding the failed Picariello Sale is his hurt feelings about the fact that Michael Elbery made fools out of Attorney's of the Mass. Bar. In this case, one fool is Attorney Charles Long, who does not know enough not to document his fraud and blatant illegalities but puts it in writing, so that Michael Elbery can crap all over Long with the irrefutable documented evidence that Long produced and signed his name to, all allowing Michael Elbery to broadcast Long's stupidity to the World Free Internet. What can you expect? Long is just another inferior real estate attorney and is afraid of real law.
Ewers heart also bleeds for Attorney James A. McLaughlin who caused the Picariello Sale to be aborted when McLaughlin stuck his foot in the door an ordered the buyer's attorney and the seller's attorney to get his "Assent to Sell the Real Estate" at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, mass. signed by all 5 heirs so to entitle Attorney James A. McLaughlin to be handed over the buyer's check for $750K. As above, 4 of the 5 owners and heirs of June Elbery refused to sign McLaughlin's Assent to Sell the Real Estate House, as well, 3 heirs refused to sign the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement further killing the $750K sale. Yes, Attorney James A. McLaughlin was again a fool.
Ewers takes liberty to fabricate law on page 4 of his "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" "there was an "Assent form" distributed to be signed by all in order to allow Attorney James A. McLaughlin to petition the Court for "License to Sell Real Estate", a required action to be taken to correct the deed before the house can be sold". Ewers credits Robert Elbery with saying that Michael Elbery then went off on another tirade at McLaughlin, claiming if we sign "his" assent form, he will steal the check for $750K". There are a few evidentiary and legal problems with some of the fabrications by Ewers surrounding the "Assent form". First, Michael Elbery had not spoken to McLaughlin for almost a year by the date of the Picariello deal in April of 2016, so Michael Elbery could not gone off on a tirade, even if Ewers says so. Second, Ewers is lying about law! Much like his fellow dual citizen Israeli compatriot Mark Wolf did and had to resign over. The Assent form is used for the one legal purpose, only, and that was to get Attorney James A. McLaughlin issued a "License to Sell the Real Estate" at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. by the Norfolk County Probate Court; that Assent form has no other legal use (just read it), let alone Attorney Ewers' lie that it was "a required action to be taken to correct the deed before the house can be sold".
What is Ewers fabricating? Here it is, "there was an Assent form distributed to be signed by all 5 owners in order to allow Attorney James A. McLaughlin to petition the Court for "License to Sell Real Estate", a required action to be taken to correct the deed before the house can be sold". This is fabrication by Ewers of Massachusetts law. The Assent Form that was stuck in the faces of the 5 heirs and owners of the Estate House had nothing to do with a Deed or even the Certificate of Title and could not be used as such. The LCP-2 Form is used to get the names of the 5 owners of the Estate House in their names on the "Certificate of Deeds".
Ewers then on p. 5 of his "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" " complains that Michael Elbery's right to self-representation under the U.S. Constitution "crossed another Moral line"; it is not surprising that Ewers, who supports a political Agenda that finds the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights an obstruction to power, would find Michael Elbery's right to represent himself during the Picariello Sale crossing Ewers Moral line. Fuck Ewers and bravo for the Rights of the Individual in this U.S.A. as guaranteed by the Anglo-Teuton founding fathers via there document called the Constitution.
How did Ewers object per p. 5 of his "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" " to Michael Elbery's Constitutional Right to Self-Representation? Ewers writes on p. 5 of his "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" " that "Michael Elbery additionally crossed another moral line and called the Buyer's closing attorney and demanded them to change the Purchase and Sale Agreement to state that Michael Elbery gets a check written to him at the closing". This is self-representation; the way the Picariello Purchase and Sale was written the check would have gone to Attorney Charles Long who did not represent Michael Elbery.
Ewers, without any evidence, claims that Michael Elbery's actions were the sole reason for the Picariello Sale to end. But that is not surprising because all Attorney Raymond "the clam" Ewers accusations are generalizations unsupported by evidence, or are blatant lies. Instead, as herein, everything Michael Elbery did regarding the Picariello deal was according to law and cannot cause him to liable for the cost of a "Petition for Partition".
Irrelevant LCP-2 Petition - Ewers then, per p. 5 of his "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" ", finishes off his groundless accusations against Michael Elbery causing the Picariello Sale to fail by claiming through Robert Elbery, "with no buyer the only option to put the deed in our names was for Attorney James A. McLaughlin to distribute an LCP-2 form and petition the courts for amended deed." Ewers is supposed to be a real estate attorney, so maybe he should explain what an Amended Deed is? There is a legally required Petition (LCP-2 Petition) needed to petition the Mass. Land Court to "Order a New Certificate of Title" in the names of the 5 heirs of June Elbery, who owned the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. There was no attempt by any of the hired lawyers, (buyer's or seller's) or the realtor on the Picariello attempted Sale to put the "Certificate of Title" (not called a Deed if Registered through the Land Court at the Registry of Deeds in Mass.) in the names of the 5 new owners of the Estate House because their plan was that Attorney James A. McLaughlin was to receive the buyer's check for $750K and then legally do as he wanted with that money. Because McLaughlin had no Authority or Jurisdiction over the Real Estate part of the Estate of June Elbery, then there was no legal requirement that any of the 5 owners of the Estate House hire him to transfer, via an LCP-2 Petition to the Mass. Land Court, to the names of the 5 owners a new "Certificate of Title" at the Norfolk Registry of Deeds from that Real Estate being in the name of June Elbery. How Michael Elbery choosing not to hire Attorney James A. McLaughlin to file the LCP-2 Petition is relevant to the Picariello Sale failing or any other potential sale of the Estate House failing is not explained by Ewers, however, it is totally irrelevant to any of Robert Elbery's and Ewers claim to any of their 4 Attempted Estate House sales failing. Attorney James A. McLaughlin's imposition on the 5 owners of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. occurred in June of 2017 after the Picariello Sale was cancelled by Realtor - Ned Mahoney and the buyer's attorney, Cecala, and Attorney Charles Long (represented 4 owners of the Estate House) in the first week of May of 2017.
Because Attorney James A. McLaughlin failed in his attempt to steal more money from the owners of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. by having Attorney Charles Long attempt to trick the 5 owners into signing McLaughlin's Assent form, the LCP-2 Petition combined with McLaughlin's Deed of Distribution was McLaughlin's new trick to control the realty at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. Had the LCP-2 Petition been signed by all 5 owners of the Estate House, McLaughlin would have combined it with his Deed of Distribution to have legal right to sell the Estate House and grab the sale proceeds before transferring the names of the 5 owners to the "Certificate of Title". Michael Elbery refused to sign the LCP-2 Petition, thus foiling McLaughlin's new trick of embezzlement.
Reasons Michael Elbery refused to sign the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement
Self Representation - The reason Michael Elbery refused to sign the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement is because it did not reflect that Michael Elbery chose to represent himself, but instead the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement indicated that Attorney Charles Long represent Michael Elbery. In other words, the 2 lawyers and Ned Mahoney were trying to force Michael Elbery to be legally represented by Attorney Charles Long, who Michael Elbery fired for trying to trick him and the other heirs into signing Attorney James A. McLaughlin's Assent to Sell Real Estate.
Home Insurance - Ewers and Robert Elbery have deliberately lied about the Picariello Sale because they omitted the reasons why the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement could not be signed by the owners of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. The Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement could not be signed because Picariello and her attorney demanded via the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement, paragraph #13, that there be insurance on the house at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. However, there was no home insurance at that date and to sign the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement was an instant Breach of Contract. Michael Elbery alerted all the other 4 owners of their Estate House by email that he contacted the Insurance Agent and learned that the insurance expired on December 2, 2016 (approximately 6 months prior). The 5 owners had in November of 2016 been forced by Attorney James A. McLaughlin to authorize McLaughlin to take about $2,000.00 out of the Probated Estate Cash and renew the Insurance Policy on the Estate House, instead McLaughlin stole the money.
The buyer's attorney, Cecala, was also informed that there was no insurance money on the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. and that if any of the seller's signed the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement that they were committing Fraud and Breaching Contract.
Three Heirs Refused to sign the Picariello Purchase and Sale Agreement, so why are Robert Elbery and Attorney Ewers claiming the Michael Elbery is responsible for that Picariello Sale aborting. Because they want to hook Michael Elbery for the cost of a "Petition for Partition" with their lies and half-truths.
4. Mahoney Ordered to Re-Group - still no Certificate of Title (Deed) in the names of the heirs
Robert Elbery claims that in August of 2017, "after the Deed was amended" that Michael Elbery again sabotaged the sale of the Estate House because he refused to sign Ned Mahoney's Exclusive sales listing. Robert correctly states that Michael Elbery refused to sign Mahoney's Exclusive listing because the Deed (Certificate of Title) was not in the names of the 5 heirs of June Elbery, including Michael Elbery's name. Robert claims that the "deed had been sent to all the heirs in July."
Here is fact that is irrefutable. To this day of 12-16-17 the Certificate of Title (Deed) to the Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. is still not in the names of Michael Elbery or the other 4 heirs of June Elbery. Further, in late August of 2017 Michael Elbery requested from the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds a certified copy of the "Certificate of Title" the Registry had in their records for the land at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. and that certification from the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds yielded irrefutable evidence that Certificate of Title (Deed) was not in the names of the 5 heirs of June Elbery but there was an "Order for a New Certificate of Title" from the Mass. Land Court still outstanding for that same land.
Michael Elbery also did searches of the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds public records on November 11, 2017 and August 27, 2017 and got the same documented Norfolk County Registry of Deeds information and that is that the land (Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.) is not in the names of the 5 heirs of June Elbery, rather there is the same outstanding for an "Order for New Certificate of Title" from the Mass. Land Court with Michael Elbery's name spelt wrong and then crossed out and written in with black felt pen.
Michael Elbery informed all parties involved, including the other 4 heirs and their attorney and realtor Mahoney, that once the Certificate of Title was in the name of the heirs of June Elbery then he would sign Mahoney's Exclusive listing.
The 93A claim, via a 93Aletter, that Michael Elbery had every right under the law to file against Mahoney is still pending. Mahoney and his real estate franchise - Keller Williams hired a local law firm in the Brockton, Mass. area to defend that 93A claim. How Ewers comes to the conclusion that that new 93A lawsuit was "stopped" by Michael Elbery is any phony guess, but there is a 4 year statute of limitations on a 93A claim. It seems this alleged attorney, Ewers, has a hard time with law and evidence. Stop that lying Raymond "the clam" Ewers.
Michael Elbery has also sued Mahoney again when he named Ned
Mahoney as a Third Party Defendant in this most recent "Petition for Partition"
Ewers filed for Joyce "gert" Elbery.
For the above reasons Robert Elbery and his mouthpiece and ghost writer, Raymond "the clam" Ewers, are blowing smoke up their ass and lying that Michael Elbery was responsible for the 4 Sales attempts of the Estate House going bad, and therefore, Michael Elbery should pay the $100,000.00+ cost of the "Petition for Partition".
The Arnoa "as is" "no contingencies" "Cash Offer" for a fast $700K is not part of the Plan and voided
What Ewers and co-conspirators do not want to talk about (conceal) is the Arnoa "as is" "cash Offer". Once the attorneys who controlled the Picariello Sale decided there was no deal because there fellow bar attorney, Attorney James A. McLaughlin, could not get at least a cut of the action because 4 of the owners of the Elbery Estate House refused to sign over the buyer's $750K check to McLaughlin via his Assent to Sell Real Estate, Realtor Ned Mahoney should have immediately contacted Nicholas Arnao who made an "as is" $700K cash offer for the Estate House at the same time Picariello made her 30 day "as is offer" conditioned on Picariello getting ONE MILLION DOLLARS in mortgage money. After all only two weeks went by from the time that Arnoa and Picariello made their written Offers for the Elbery Estate House and until the date when the Picariello deal went down the drain and Ned Mahoney also took the Elbery Estate House off the market, all in violation of his Exclusive Listing Contract.
Ned Mahoney wasn't doing anything that wasn't the Orders of his masters, the attorneys who controlled him for Attorney James A. McLaughlin. Because McLaughlin didn't get his cut of the action, then the Elberys were not going to be allowed to sell their house. Fuck McLaughlin.
The Position of defendant, David Elbery and Attorney Billy Crowe's blasts of irrelevant and false accusations
In this section, p. 6-8, of Ewers' "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" Attorney Billy Crowe and his client, David Elbery, present no evidence that Michael Elbery prevented the sale of the Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass., nor do they present any evidence that would cause Michael Elbery to be liable for the cost of the "Petition for Partition". This section of Ewers' "Joint Case Management Conference Statement , written by Attorney Billy Crowe is a rambling "scatter gun" "mumbo-jumbo" typical of the confused and frustrated mind of Attorney Billy Crowe, whose specialty is fleecing each and every client for his alleged legal services, so Crowe can turn over his earnings to his landlord on Franklin St., Boston, Mass., poor boy, Billy Crowe, he lives the life of a "Rat Race". Amazing that Crowe lives in such a modest neighborhood in such a "plain Jane" house in a neighborhood off Rt. 135 across from the old Sand pits in Needham, Mass., he's got nothing left after paying his overhead. Dumb Business.
However, Attorney Billy Crowe is not stopped by lying, see p. 6 of "Joint Case Management Conference Statement", that a "Petition for Partition is necessary because of the continuous, malicious, bad faith dilatory efforts by Defendant, Michael Elbery" which Crowe falsely claims started the day June Elbery died on March 26, 2015.
What sense would it be for Michael Elbery to do anything other than to want to sell his Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.? Selling the house means about 1/5 share of the sale proceeds of the Estate House which has a market value of $750K and that results to about $150K. Crowe now demands that that 150K l go to the Cost of the "Petition for Partition" because Crowe has implied during phone conversation with Michael Elbery on 11-14-17 that the whole case is a pre-arranged "Bag Job" regardless of the evidence that Michael Elbery presents that shows that the reasons Attorney Crowe and Company produce to make Michael Elbery liable for the cost of the "Petition for Partition" are lies, name calling, and sweeping generalities or false accusations.
Most of "David Elbery's Position" via the "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" is a review of Michael Elbery's publication of the events of injustice experience by the 5 heirs of June Elbery in the Web Site www.massinjustice.org. It is nice to know that Crowe is one of the over 200 readers per day (for many years now) that read Michael Elbery's web site. It is also nice to know that Attorney Billy Crowe is unhappy about that same publication that Michael Elbery conveniently broadcasts over the World Free Internet. However, there are a few factual statements made by Crowe that, although unsupported by evidence, will be addressed and countered as lies.
Crowe claims, p. 6 of the "Joint Case Management Conference Statement", he motioned for the Appointment of an independent Personal Representative. Big Deal, that had to happen, as a matter of law, because the 5 heirs would not agree to David Elbery's illegal appointment by the Probate Court in Norfolk County, see insert for documented proof that Crowe wishes would go away. Michael Elbery downloaded a "hard copy" of the docket entries of the Estate of June Elbery, so the Probate Court could not cover up the illegal appointment of David Elbery. The Norfolk County Probate Court Clerk's Office absolved themselves, and Judge Casey, from guilt by claiming it was all a "just a mistake". David Elbery had to return the Licenses from the Norfolk County Probate Court that allowed him to administer almost $800,000.00 in Estate cash that was left by the deceased, June Elbery. Did David Elbery take anything in 2 weeks he had the illegal Probate Estate Licenses issued to him? No one knows, as David Elbery has chosen to "remain silent" while also exercising his 6th amendment right to counsel, Crowe, doing all his talking. Funny way to behave regarding an inheritance, one would think that David Elbery is hiding something.
Crowe lies on p. 6 of the "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" and falsely claims that he filed for an "Independent Court Appointed Personal Representative" in hope that the litigation would stop. Far from reality. Per David Elbery's affidavits (see Affidavit #2) filed during the litigation David Elbery swore under oath that he no longer wanted to be the Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery; how nice, he had no choice because Michael Elbery and Joyce Elbery Objected to David Elbery getting his hands on the Estate assets because they knew David Elbery is the sneakiest of underhanded crooks. Joyce Elbery was put in fear of Billy Crowe by David Elbery so she refused to sign an Objection. But the big point is that after David Elbery declared he wanted out (see Affidavit #2), however, Attorney Billy Crowe continued the litigation surrounding David Elbery as Personal Representative, for months, giving Michael Elbery, who works for free, no choice but to respond or Michael Elbery would have automatically lost because of Default. And stupid David had to pay Crowe for his needless litigation that was won by Michael Elbery.
Crowe, like all attorneys of the Bar, have a motive to cause as much needless litigation as possible because that is how the attorneys make money!
Crowe also claims he motioned for a Independent Court Appointed Personal Representative because he hoped that Michael Elbery's "historic bad relations" with his siblings, also fellow heirs of June Elbery, would be diminished. How does this make any sense, even if you don't analyze or explain what "historic bad relations" means? True, Michael Elbery had learned to, for 20 years, exclude David Elbery from his life and knew David Elbery was trying to cheat all the heirs out of their legally entitled 1/5 share of June Elbery's Estate. Joyce Elbery said she hates David Elbery and disclosed that David Elbery was pissed off that Robert Elbery was made an heir to June Elbery's Estate as a matte of law because she died without a Will (in testate). David Elbery tried to get June Elbery to file a Will and exclude Robert Elbery from the proceeds of her Estate. Kathleen Elbery also hated David Elbery for many years prior to any Estate of June Elbery, just read the affidavits starting at #25. According to Kathleen Elbery David ruined a Thanksgiving Day diner by making the only topic of discussion "farts" which Robert Elbery enthusiastically joined in on that "farts" only conversation. David Elbery is not only a crook but a real "fartmaster". Historic Bad relations among the siblings of June Elbery are totally irrelevant to Attorney Billy Crowe's claims that Michael Elbery, not him and his client David Elbery, were the cause of the Estate House not being sold.
David Elbery tried unsuccessfully to get mother, June Elbery, to sell her Needham, Mass. house at 168 Fairfield St. for years before her death, so David Elbery would have an easier job liquidating her Estate. David Elbery was presuming, long before June Elbery died back in the early 1990's, that he would by made the "fiduciary" (now called Personal Representative) of June Elbery's Estate with the help of the influence peddling of Attorney Michael Crowe (billy Crowe's brother). Had he been successful, June Elbery would have died almost immediately upon leaving that house she lived in since 1954 because she was not equipped to deal with world in apartment building. The same will happen to Attorney Kathleen Elbery once she is, maybe someday in the future, made to leave her rent free home at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. Kathleen is all done once she has to deal with other people in apartment complex or apartment building. Kathleen was at war with all her neighbors on Eric Rd., Medfield for years before she sold that house in 2015, and her house was in a neighborhood of large wood private lots that make neighbors sparse and less than familiar. Attorney Kathleen Elbery is also a C.P.A. but has not worked in over a decade because she can't get along in the workplace and has been Blackballed. Kathleen Elbery has been living rent free at the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. since June Elbery died in March of 2015 and she has been arrested at least twice by the Needham cops for 30 day Observation in the Norwood Hospital Psychiatric Ward because of her irrational behavior in that Needham neighborhood.
Crowe Claims, without Evidence, that Michael Elbery Caused Hanna to quit as Personal Representative (this has nothing to do with the Estate House Sale)
Attorney Billy Crowe claims on p. 7 of Ewer's "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" that "Michael Elbery's actions eventually caused Steven Hanna to resign and terminate his position as personal representative". Crowe presents no evidence to support his claim that Michael Elbery eventually caused Steven Hanna to quit, instead Crowe sticks copied portions of the article Michael Elbery wrote in his web site www.massinjustice.org about the Estate of June, part of the same article you are reading now. Even if Crowe has evidence that Michael Elbery somehow caused Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of June Elbery to resign, how is that relevant to the sale of the Estate House?, How are those excerpts from this article of www.massinjustice.org relevant to Crowe's false claim that Michael Elbery is liable for the cost of the "Petition for Partition"? The excerpts Crowe inserts in italics copied from this hyperlink of www.massinjustice.org on the Probate of the Estate of June Elbery were all written long after Hanna resigned on April 30 of 2016. How could Hanna have known what Michael Elbery would document in the future about his, Hanna's, illegalities concerning the Estate of June Elbery?
What Crowe doesn't understand is that the Probated Estate of June Elbery is legally separate from the Real Estate June Elbery left to her heirs. The Hanna resignation that Crowe is belly-aching about is from Hanna's Appointed Position by the Norfolk County Probate Court to liquidate the Probated Estate part of June Elbery's Estate which Hanna completed by mid-February of 2016, long before he resigned on April 30, 2017. Crowe produces no evidence that the reason for Hanna violating the Sales Contract to sell the Elbery Estate House was the liability of Michael Elbery. This would be contract issue not Probate Court issue. In fact, Crowe does not even claim that Steve Hanna quit his private contract with the heirs of June Elbery to sell their Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.
Hanna walked away from his private sales contract to sell the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. in April of 2017 and took $7,000.00 from the Probated Estate Cash to unilaterally pay himself for his abysmal sales failure at his regular rate of $225.00/hr.. Steve Hanna's private sales contract with the 5 owners of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. specified, per item 6a., - "a real estate broker will not be utilized."
Attorney Billy Crowe has been one of the major reasons why the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. has not been sold after almost 3 years after the death of June Elbery on March 26, 2017. In order to maximize his fleecing of David Elbery, who wants to have Crowe's friend and is willing to pay for them, Crowe has caused the Estate of June Elbery, both the Probated Estate and the Real Estate, to be open as long as possible. That's how the lawyer makes money, by keeping the litigation and disputes going.
Another major reason why the Estate of June Elbery is still open is that one of June Elbery's heirs, Kathleen Elbery, has been living in the Estate House rent free while illegally, with the support of the Probate Judge John Casey, claiming it as her own sole and exclusive property. Good Deal for Attorney Kathleen, she has been living in the very stately Needham, Mass. rent free in house that she could never otherwise afford; Kathleen had always wanted to reside in Needham, Mass. but could not afford Needham. Kathleen had always pretended to reside in Needham, Mass. by having a P.O. box at the Needham, Mass. Post Office. According to Court Appointed Personal Representative, Steve Hanna, Kathleen had David Elbery arrested by the Needham cops on the front lawn of the Estate House for trying to enter his house. Kathleen has no more legal rights to the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. than the other 4 owners. Joyce Elbery had to get permission from the Norfolk County Probate Judge John Casey to enter the Estate House back in May of 2016, however, Judge Casey had absolutely no right Authority or Jurisdiction over the Real Estate part of the Estate of June Elbery, only the Probated part which is the personal property (mostly cash or near cash items) left by June Elbery. Judge Casey acted illegally in advocating Attorney Kathleen Elbery's sole and exclusive De Facto use and ownership of the Estate House. Kathleen threatened Michael Elbery with criminal charges if he even called that Estate house phone, the same phone number that has been at that location since the mid-1950's when dial phones were installed by New England Telephone in that Needham, Mass. neighborhood.
Kathleen Elbery has never wanted to sell the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. because it is extremely beneficial to her that it remains unsold.
Michael Elbery has been one of the heirs of June Elbery that wanted to get rid of the Estate House from day one when June Elbery died on March 26, 2015. The way the legal system of Estates and inheritances works in Massachusetts is that you can't get your free money left you by the deceased benefactor until the Government (in this case the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds) says so. All the inheritance passes through the Probate Court to the heirs. Michael Elbery, who is an enemy of the Authorities of the State of Massachusetts due to his litigation and quest for liberty, Justice and truth, knew since March of 2015 that he would be lucky to get anything out of the $1.6 million left by his mother, June Elbery. Michael Elbery has received in the winter of 2016, $91, 800.00 from his legally entitled inheritance and the Authorities in Massachusetts are not going to let him get any more of that money that is his legally entitled inheritance. Stealing from a person shows they have no respect from that person. After all, Michael Elbery earned no respect when he was released from Massachusetts State Prison finishing 10 years for a phony false arrest and malicious prosecution for Attempted Mayhem that was originally found to be NO PROBABLE CAUSE. How many men get railroaded in a Court of law in Massachusetts and do their "framed up" Prison sentence and when released do nothing about it? Most. The Authorities learn that they are immune from retaliation for the crimes of throwing people in jail via Kangaroo courts. So why not rob this guy, Michael Elbery, of his inheritance? They figure he won't do anything that causes them pain that they can never forget!
The system also works this way. When the Authorities are stealing your inheritance from you, you are supposed to sit back and allow it or they will attack you and steal more. Who are you going to call when the cops do the killing or the Probate Court and its Presiding Judge advocate the Stealing of your inheritance? You can call the F.B.I. on the state and local cops but there is no such safety valve when the Probate Court Authorities act illegally. Oh you can Appeal, but in Mass. that is just more selective prosecution not law. Death, heart attacks, black ballings, resignations, firings and who knows what the future will bring in the form of Justice?
Scandal of Attorney William Crowe
This Web site has been promising the Scandal on Billy Crowe, the little 5' 5" read headed boy who played on the Needham High Soccer Team in 1969 and 1970 coached by Mr. Don Brock. Billy Crowe needed to take anabolic steroids to play Soccer because he lacked strength and athletic ability. Crowe wasn't just a cheating drug user but he has more Scandal from his early years. Billy Crowe knocked up an underage high school girl named Janet Lambert in the late 1960's long before Rowe v. Wade made abortion legal in this here U.S.A.. Not only that, but Crowe like everything else he does, illegally escaped with impunity for rape charges. He left behind a an orphan and ran away for everybody else to inherit the human misery he caused. Wouldn't you know this fucking piece of shit squirt would become an Attorney of the Mass. Bar, that's right a lawyer. Fuck you Billy and fuck your whole family.
It is nice to see pictures of people who took those anabolic Steroids years ago. They all aged horribly. Some like Mike Fitzgerald of Needham, Mass. looks like he is suffering from the effects of the steroids his physician father injected him with starting way back in the mid-1960's. It is known now that those steroid drugs cause hardening of the arteries due to the cholesterol they are, as well as, as damaging the liver and kidneys. Tuff Shit, boys; you were big shot not so great teenage athletes, now, you suffer for decades with the massive and unnatural Estrogen that is caused when the excessive Free Testosterone produced by the Steroids breaking down into Estrogen. Bobby Potts was the main distributor of those anabolic Steroids in Needham, Mass. back in the 1960's and early '70's.
During the first conversation Michael Elbery had with this blow hard Crowe, who uses an amplifier on his phone to make his voice sound big and bad, Crowe slammed the phone on Michael Elbery when he reminded Crowe that he remembered him from decades ago.
Crowe Claims Michael Elbery threatened lawyers and insulted them "frustrating the process of selling the Elbery's home"
Attorney Billy Crowe seems to be saying on p. 7 of "Joint Case Management Conference Statement", without any supporting evidence, that Michael Elbery prevented the Estate House from being sold. Crowe in the first sentence claims that "Michael Elbery has written similarly insulting, derogatory material related to nearly everyone that has been involved in the probate of the Estate of June Elbery." What does the probated part of the Estate, which is the personal property (not the house left by June Elbery), have to do with selling the Estate House left at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.? Doesn't make any difference because, as is typical Billy Crowe, he make generalized statements without naming individuals (Crowe says "everyone") or presenting evidence as to when and what Michael Elbery wrote.
Anything that was written and reported by Michael Elbery about the illegalities and injustice in this article/hyperlink of his web site massinjustice.org surrounding the sale of the Estate House was written after the events took place to make sure all evidence was documented and irrefutable; it would have been impossible for the few alleged salespeople and lawyers involved, thus far, in the aborted or attempted sales of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. to have read about their illegal and or incompetent performance concerning the sale of that same Estate House until long after they were either fired or quit. So how did massinjustice.org prevent the sale of the Elbery Estate House or even "frustrate" that sale?
Isn't it funny how Crowe and Ewers have similar lack of verbal comprehension causing limited vocabulary. Attorney Billy Crowe's "word of the day" is frustrated and that is because he, Crowe, is frustrated. Ewers, on the other hand, likes the word, "frivolous" because Ewers is the very definition of frivolous. Maybe on another day they will both learn a new word.
Because Crowe is so vague and ambiguous about what writings by Michael Elbery Crowe is addressing, it is necessary to guess. Maybe, Crowe thinks that Michael Elbery filed legal documents with the Norfolk County Probate Court concerning the sale of the Estate House. But that would be impossible because, unlike Attorney Billy Crowe, Michael Elbery understands the law in Massachusetts gives no Jurisdiction or Authority over the Estate House or Real Estate left by the Deceased. So Michael Elbery never filed any written papers or any legal documents with any court concerning the Estate House at 168 Fairfield st., Needham, Mass.
Michael Elbery did during his last phone call to Attorney Billy Crowe, scold Crowe about his refusal to deal in Law, and Fact supported by truthful evidence. Crowe can't take the time to learn how to do that. No wonder, Michael Elbery beat Crowe at all three pieces of litigation that Crowe represented David Elbery on concerning the Estate of June Elbery. This lawyer, Billy Crowe, never cites law, as well as, never supporting his grandiose generalized vague and ambiguous statements with evidence. Instead, Crowe curries for favor with court and fleeces his clients for his worthless legal work. It's just like Attorney Bobby the Toff Sheketoff said years ago, "Billy Crowe knows how to make money".
Attorney billy Crowe claims Due Process of Law frustrates the sale of the Elbery Estate House - Oil Spill & Lead Paint Contamination
On page 7-8 of Ewer's "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" Attorney Billy Crowe complains that "Michael Elbery has already predictably attempted to frustrate the sale through his initial pleadings in this partition action with cross-claims and counter claims". This is just more of the same old Crowe, he was hoping, like Ewers, that Michael Elbery would default instead of defending himself using Due Process of Law. Crowe knows how treacherous the Courts are when faced with Justice who crusades his case and cause. An unbiased fair forum of Justice, a courtroom, can be a real embarrassment and risk to a lawyer like Crowe when faced with an adversary not obliged by corruption. Crowe complains that Due Process of Law frustrates the sale of the Estate House? It speaks for itself, it is not supposed to happen in this here U.S.A. but Crowe does not know any better and even put it in writing.
On page 8 of Ewer's "Joint Case Management Conference Statement" Attorney Billy Crowe gets uncharacteristically specific. Crowe cites paragraph #8 of Michael Elbery's Answer to the "Petition for Partition" as cause for concern and another source for more complaining by Attorney Billy Crowe regarding Michael Elbery's right to Due Process of Law.
On 11-14-17 Michael Elbery made a telephone call to Attorney Billy Crowe in order to schedule a "Conference Call" as mandated by the Mass. Land Court concerning the "Petition for Partition", as herein. Crowe mocked Michael Elbery while laughing at him saying that he was going to have to pay for the cost, Crowe implied that the Partition case was a "Pre-Planned Bag Job" and that it had already been decided (illegally without evidence) againstMichael Elbery. Crowe let Michael Elbery know that the Mass. Land Court would be assessing his share of the proceeds from the sale of the Estate House for the entire Cost of the "Petition for Partition" process. Then in a reversal, Crowe begged Michael Elbery not to reveal the lead paint contamination or Oil Spill that is under the foundation and foundation floor of the Elbery Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.. Ya, more fraud.
Crowe now claims, specifically, that Michael Elbery's paragraph #8 to his Answer which discloses an Oil Spill and Contamination and Lead Paint at the Estate House is another example of Michael Elbery's attempt to "frustrate" the sale of the Estate House. Billy Crowe wanted Michael Elbery to Commit fraud and leave some poor unsuspecting buyer holding the bag for the cost of the oil and lead paint pollution at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass.
Mass. and Federal law is that Lead Paint is presumed to exist on houses built before 1978.
Crowe slammed the phone down when Michael Elbery laughed at him.
Majority votes of the Elberys caused by their sentiment due to the reporting and documenting of Michael Elbery in this article/hyperlink of www.massinjustice.org of the illegalities and injustice and other issues of curiosity surrounding the Estate of June Elbery is not the legal standard to assess Michael Elbery for the cost of the "'Petition for Partition". The Mass. Land Court is required to examine the Evidence surrounding the attempted sales of the Estate House at 168 Fairfield St., Needham, Mass. via a trial to determine who will pay the cost of the Partition.