168 Fairfield St.
Needham, Mass. 02192
Judicial Nominating Committee
State House - Room 56
RE: Attorney Louis P. Aloise - candidate for Worcester District Judge
I write to you regarding the candidacy of Attorney Louis P. Aloise for District
Judge in Worcester County. Attorney Aloise represented me in 1993 on several
criminal charges that resulted in no probable cause at Worcester District
Court on 1-20-93, see attached A.
The Worcester D.A.'s office then indicted me with only one witness from among
five who testified at the probable cause hearing. The grand jury proceedings
were impaired by the Worcester D.A.'s office. In addition to concealing evidence
via the testimonies of the other probable cause hearing witness the medical
evidence presented to the grand jury was falsified, see B attached.
The charge of assault with a dangerous weapon was knowingly, by Aloise and the D.A.'s
office, fabricated. This is documented by the D.A.'s office prior to either the probable
cause hearing or grand jury, see attached C. Aloise had in his possession all
the documentation referred to in B and C and was well aware that the indictments
were impaired. Aloise had spoken to me after the indictments and said he would seek
dismissals on the various indictments/charges, yet he did nothing.
Further at trial on June 93, resulting in my illegal conviction of attempted
mayhem (no weapon involved), Aloise knowingly allowed the Worcester D.A.'s
Office to falsify evidence against me. The alleged victim-witness was allowed to
testify, as he did at the grand jury proceedings, that his eye was cut, lacerated,
bleeding, leaking vitreous fluid, permanently damaged, almost out of his head. The
truth is that the alleged victim suffered only a red eyeball or bloodshot eye,
see attachments marked B , with DR. Hull's Affs., and letter.
At trial Aloise never challenged the alleged victim about his claim of severe eye
injuries, Aloise never allowed me to see the medical evidence that revealed the
alleged victim was treated by a physician for minor eye injuries. The jury was
allowed to believe that the alleged victim had his eye twice brutally thumbed,
although per medical documentation, it is clear that the alleged victim told
the physician and registered nurse he got a finger in the eye. Aloise never called
as witnesses the treating medical professionals in order to conceal the truth and
protect the victim-witness. I learned of the actual medical evidence through
my own investigation after being released on parole from a 10 year state prison
Aloise admitted at trial side bar per the trial transcript that he had read and
understood the medically documented evidence of the alleged victim - witness, see
Attorney Aloise cooperating with the Worcester D.A.'s office allowed the prosecution
to indict me and charge me at trial with assault with a dangerous weapon (broken beer
bottle). Aloise was informed by A.D.A. Michael Salloum, prior to the probable
cause hearing that the witness-"victim" admitted there was no such incident. The
government documents, per C attached, there was no intention even prior to the
probable cause hearing, of seeking convictions on this charge. At the probable
cause hearing ( I have the transcript) all the prosecution witnesses admitted
there was no bottle assault.
At the probable cause hearing Aloise per his cross examination documents that
A.D.A. Salloum had informed him that the prosecution witnesses and "victim"
admitted that the reported bottle assault to the police did not happen, see
E, attached. The allowance of this false charge contaminated my entire trial with
prejudicial constitutional error. Aloise never challenged the alleged victim on
this serious charge of a 30 second assault with a broken beer bottle.
These are only some of the highlights of Aloise's wrongdoing and conspiracy in
relation to my illegal conviction.
I am in the finishing stages of completing a motion for new trial under Rule 30
of the M.R.C.P. which if necessary will go before the highest Federal Courts in
the land. The factual claims I make in this motion are all documented by third
Attorney Aloise was also successful, after my illegal conviction in discouraging
other attorneys from advocating my post conviction defense, this being disclosed to
me by one well known Boston attorney who refunded my retainer of $5,000.00.
I alert you to these circumstances well in advance of your decision pertaining to
appointment of Worcester District Judge. I expect this post conviction activity
relating to my illegal conviction to result in great controversy via media
As a judge Aloise may be an embarrassment. Aloise is seeking sanctuary via judgeship.